Olympus V311050BE000 M.Zuiko dIGITAL 17mm F/1.8 Lens - Black. 29 product ratingsAbout this product. A nice compact lens giving the equivalent angle of view of a 34mm lens on a 35mm sensor/fillm. Maybe not the sharpest wide open at f1.8 but so useful to be able to get that extra light in Manuel..Aston Martin..sorry...I spelled it incorrectly..British carhttp://www.diseno-art.com/news_content/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2012-Aston-Martin-Vanquish-8.jpg
The exposure-compensation dial is solid, firm, and easy to change with some effort (while not easy to accidentally change while in your camera bag).Plenty shallow DOF here:http://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts/Music/and herehttp://photohounds.smugmug.com/Performing-arts/Eurobeat-by-Supa/|.. tbc ...
Now that you lot have covered every practical focal length with primes (save telephotos) - how 'bout some native OLY fast zooms?As many have pointed out quite correctly, F is the function of lens opening vs. focal length and will let in a constant amount of light. Adjustments are made, however for the light gathering capabilities of lens and other factors (number of lens elements) but it is meant to be a constant like shutter speed so that light metering will produce the same results for the same value. A light meter reading of 1/125 at f8 for ISO 200 is the same for any camera.Now if you actually compare the 17mm f1.8 to that 50mm f1.8 the 17mm is a fair bit sharper wide open, so if you want a sharp image and not just a shallow image by the time you've stopped the 50mm down enough you've got almost the same DoF anyway.
I visit DPR when I have some spare time left during working hours. I'm guessing that goes for 99,99% of the users in here.The fact the samples appear to reflect disinterest on the part of the tester is irrelevant to the lens itself.I don't quite get all the complaints about DoF, considering that this is hardly an ideal portrait lens. I've seen plenty of nice portraits with satisfactory subject isolation taken with m4/3 cameras at longer focal lengths.I don't get either, why so many confuse bokeh with DoF. You can't have more or less bokeh, only good or bad bokeh. It's a quality, not a quantity.
OK..just got this lens and shade yesterday..Have done a little testing and the lens is good...but does not WOW like the 12mm and the 75mm. The images do sharpen up nicely in LR and it is "I think" the best offering in this focal length range with its build quality, extremely fast focus, snap focus ring, 1.8 aperture. I read a review some where and the reviewer mentioned that "as soon as he saw the small glass opening of the lens he knew that it could not be a "great" lens...like it or not, at the same angle of view (forget focal length), more bokeh means faster and less bokeh means slower. this is physics that no one can break. It is a great walkabout, pocketable in colder weather and giver the OMDs a cool retro look while keeping the size down.do you think it's a problem to compare lenses at the same angle of view? and what's the point to compare at different ones?a half-frame camera will need ISO50 to match the image quality of ISO100 on 35mm-format, or ISO50 on 35mm-format but one-stop "underexposed" (actually this gives the same exposure to the whole photo as the half-frame).
There are 26 images in the samples gallery. Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter / magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review), we do so in good faith, please don't abuse it.I purchased 2 of them hoping the first one I got was a dud, but it wasn't.I shot the lens at F4 optimal setting for this lens at infinity focus for landscapes on my OMD and I can tell you hands down this is not a good lens for landscapes.No where near as good as the 12, 25, 45 or 75mm lenses. My opinion is that this lens is probably a good street shooter lens. Not what I has hoping for.I guess the problem is at the end of the day it is a 17mm lens, and to make a tack sharp 17mm lens for 500.00 is probably almost impossible.Though the Oly 12 which is by far not perfect, I feel does perform better over all yet again a 700.00 lens. Review Olympus null. A flexible lens for general shooting, the black M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8 from Olympus is a 34mm equivalent wide-angle prime for Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras
As they are not bazookas, and the cameras are not bricks, you could even take them all with you AND use them.This retails for 200$:http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-35mm-1-8G-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0/ref=sr_1_5?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1360323831&sr=1-5&keywords=nikon+50mm+1.4In addition to the new keyboard, the updated 13-inch models offer double the base storage (256GB), faster CPU options and Intel's latest Iris Plus Graphics with the 10-gen Intel configurations.The 300W/s monolight is battery-powered and isn't much larger than your standard 70-200mm F2.8 telephoto zoom. Despite this, it packs in plenty of power and features for just $499.
Click on this guy's name and check out his profile. Lots of negative comments aimed at m43 cameras and lenses. No photos in his gallery to show his photography credentials. There are a few of these types lurking around dpreview, unfortunately.Have a handful of snaps in my gallery (with polarizer). It's PP-ed, but that's the end result what I actually get, instead of some banal test shot with nothing applied (which I never seem to do).The 17mm f/1.8 is a great lens, but those samples are plain ugly! At that point, it could have been done with any of the best Leica I'm sure...Of course if you want to take sensor size into account when comparing lenses you have to factor in the additional cost and weight of a full frame camera too, suddenly your "cheap" full frame lens becomes $1500+ more expensive.
Princess Kate challenges the UK to document human stories and everyday life during the coronavirus pandemic, with the best 100 making up an exhibition with the National Portrait Gallery. The Olympus 17mm F/1.8 lens is an interesting lens. I've held off reviewing this for a while. There are so many reviews onlinebut i've really wanted to So Olympus' answer to the fast 35 is the 17mm F/1.8. You can read specs online, but it's basically a small light weight lens with a manual focus clutch.. As well as faster focus, the Olympus 17mm doesn't appear to cause the strange high-ISO banding that can appear with the Panasonic 20mm on an OM-D.The 18.5 1.8 is an excellent lens, and is extremely small, so Nikon should be able to make a wide faster than f2. Olympus 17mm f/1.8 Review. I Love Photography. 5 years ago|60 views. Olympus - Objectif M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm 1:1.8 compatible hybrides Olympus et Panasonic finition. robetr. 1:30. Olympus E-P5 17mm f1.8 and VF-4 16.1 MP Compact System Camera with 3-Inch LCD (Black)..
You seem to be using an unsupported browser. To get the most out of Flickr please upgrade to the latest version of Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Microsoft Edge.Furthermore, by having the LCD screen flipped backwards, I was less likely to “chimp” (to always check my photos after I shot them). Almost exactly like shooting with a film camera.Very underwhelmed with the examples apart from the bored bloke with the beard shots, which show a use for this focal legnth at least.
Just posted: Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm F1.8 sample gallery. We've been shooting with the Olympus 17mm F1.8 lens for a while now and have put together a sample gallery showing what it can do. We've also prepared some notes on the experience of shooting with the 34mm equivalent fast prime for Micro Four Thirds and included some shots that match ones we included in our Sony RX1 gallery. Beyond that we've tried to show a the lens at a series of apertures to show how the lens behaves.The technobabble used to "justify" the "must have" myth for dinosaurs as more than a nice collector's item falls flat.Another takeaway from shooting with the Olympus Pen-F — I hope to start shooting more JPEG. The black and white JPEG’s out of the Monochrome 2 mode were incredible. Quite film-like, and pleasing to my eyes in terms of the aesthetics. The 17mm f1.8 makes it easy with a two-position snap focus ring. With the ring in the autofocus position, you can either use AF or switch to I always loved the FOV of Olympus 17mm Pancake lens and when I switched to the Panasonic 20mm to get a faster lens I missed it. I wish that this lens was.. What you've just said is right, but previously you were wrong calling it "very wide angle". The term "wide angle" applies to the angle of view and takes the intended format into account, not only the absolute focal length. Otherwise, you would call all the p&s lenses "fisheye".We all know 17mm would be very wide on FF, but FF isn't a magical format, just an arbitrary reference point.
And to those who are talking about shallow dof with a lens like this haven't understood the concept of m4/3. This is a very compact portable fast and sharp lens for traveling and it's just perfect for this. If I want shallow dof I take my 5D. Olympus expands its Pro line of Micro Four Thirds lenses with two new f/1.2 primes, a wide-angle 17mm and portrait-focused 45mm. PCMag.com is your ultimate destination for tech reviews and news Blackjet's TX-4DS 4-bay Cinema Dock 3 and the TX-1CXQ reader for CFexpress Type B and XQD cards offer up impressive speeds thanks to Thunderbolt 3 technology.
CONCLUSION: So to wrap up this review, we gave the Olympus 17mm f/1.8 a 47.5/50 and our HIGHLY RECOMMENDED RATING:THE FINAL WORD: The 17mm f/1.8 prime lens is just another in a long line of stellar, compact primes courtesy of the folks over at Olympus. Great build, fast and.. Serge, Everything you say would be right IF it were true, but it's SO FARFETCHED given that the 17mm f/1.8 is actually quite satisfying: adequately sharp, very bright, producing neutral colors, low ghosting & flare , with a smoother bokeh than with the aforementioned Lumix 20mm, and a MUCH faster, quieter AF engine. Technically, the Fuji XF 35mm f/1.4 isn't any better and yet most peole agree that it's a joy to use. Stop reading lab tests, just go out and shoot! For better samples, check out Robin's excellent pictures taken that new m.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 at: http://robinwong.blogspot.ca/2012/11/olympus-mzuiko-17mm-f18-review-street.html The Olympus 17mm ƒ/1.8 m.Zuiko Digital was released in Decmeber 2012. The lens is designed to fit the micro four-thirds mount, and will not mount on standard four-thirds bodies. I decided to rewrite my review of this Olympus 17mm f/1.8 prime lens, because the optical quality of the first sample I had of..
Mosc,You need to read this:http://admiringlight.com/blog/full-frame-equivalence-and-why-it-doesnt-matter/I have a good friend Chu Viet Ha in Vietnam, and he introduced me to his friend, who is an Olympus/Leica distributor in Vietnam. I was interested in the Olympus Pen-F (mostly for the design, and curious how it was for street photography), so I asked to test out the Pen-F.
I just don't get how that gobbledygook keeps on spreading - the light gathering capabilities of a m43s f0.9 lens would be f0.9 exactly when compared to a FF system. The Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 is - as of the time of this review - the 4th high-speed prime lens for the micro-four-thirds (MFT) system by Olympus. It is a moderate wide-angle lens thus targeting applications such as street-, landscape- and still-life photography. While Olympus is shy of marketing.. BTW: which fw version is on your cam, the latest one increases battery time, Fw 1.1 fixed a bug when using some lenses with IS .... might be a good idea to look for the USB cable ;-)
@Haider It is more expensive to manufacture a FF or APS-C lens as they are designed for larger sensors, so they require more glass and larger barrels. FF and APS-C don't use as much software correction as m43 so optics have to be more highly corrected adding to the cost.btw, there is a flaw in your theory that you tried to compare photos of different angle of views which is against the basic photography. you claimed something doesn't change in two different photos. But mark power, there is only ONE photo in your gallery!!!!!..and you have been here since June 1, 2005?????????? HUH?LMAOROTF!(I come here to give and take abuse...that is basically all that goes on here!!!!! LOL!)Personally I wouldn't switch for 4 mm wider FOV, especially since the 17 1.8 doesn't perform as well.Like a first grader who learned a new dirty word, yabokkie seems hell bent on rehashing the equivalent aperture argument every chance he gets. Been there, done that, bought the t-shirt. Still chose m43.
Support this site by making a Donation, purchasing Plus Membership, or shopping with one of our affiliates: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Amazon CA, ebay UK, WEX, Park CamerasYou can't afford or don't find interest in this product at that price, don't buy it. If enough people follow your lead, it will drop in price or disappear. However, if other people buy it in sufficient quantity the manufacturer will keep selling it at that price.
The X-A7 is Fujifilm's latest, and most polished, entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera. With improved autofocus and a large touchscreen interface, we found ourselves really enjoying it.The quesion of "bokeh" which I think people are confusing with depth of field. Bokeh is the quality of the out-of-focus areas, and quite tricky to do with digital sensors due to the inherent chromatic aberrations of sensors. I have only seen Kodak sensors that really do this well. Basically longer lenses at normal apertures (e.g. f5.6-11) will give you much better results than a shorter focal length lens with a large aperture. Old-timer film photographers like me know this quite well. By far the best lens for bokeh in my experience was a 150mm Sonnar for the Hasselblad system. This lens was also so sharp you needed to use a No. 2 Softar for portraits.SnapHappy32, of course FF is arbitrarily taken as standard. It was the most popular for years so it was chosen. We could pick anything else just as well, for example 43 format, then FF would have 0.5x focal length multiplier.
I'm also putting my Panny 20mm up for sale. I bought the 17mm the other day and it's a really good lens, especially the IQ.The dials on the Pen-F feel feel phenomenal. The on-off switch is located on the left side of the camera, where the film rewind knob traditionally was.
When shooting on the Olympus Pen-F, I shot everything in “P” (program) mode, ISO 1600, center-point autofocus, and -2/3 exposure compensation. The files and imaged looked phenomenal in JPEG straight-out of camera (Mono Profile 2).Wow, I find value shooting it side by side with the RX1. It was a revelation about the RX1 in terms of jpeg processing and choosing exposures. Don't you agree it would be useful to include it in the RX1 review?According to the New York Post, B&H has furloughed roughly 400 of its 2,000 employees due to troubles caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. If you want to learn more about cameras, equipment, and how to conquer GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) check out: Equipment >
There are no switches or control surfaces on the lens other than the focus ring - all lens functions are controlled by the camera. The focus ring is an interesting design element of the lens, and we first saw this design on the Olympus 12mm m.Zuiko. The ring is metal with raised ribs, about a 3/8-inch wide. The ring can be pulled backward from its default configuration to enter a manual focusing mode, which exposes a distance scale in feet and meters; a distance scale is omnipresent, but isn't of much use unless you pull the focus ring back to display the distance scale. There is no infrared index.. It is actually OK for you to read and learn a bit instead of spouting off irrational comments about price.
olympus 17mm f1.8. 食べたい 肥土山中山周辺 初寄り 三村 ひかり OLYMPUS PEN F M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm F1.8 . Masking tape and a spray can ;-)It's a bit fiddly though........
Both are waaay better, extremely sharp, almost perfect. Serious glass. Why wasting time with muddy Zuiko, may I ask?What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.Yabokie...that is just not realistic in the marketplace. You are not going to get a relatively fast prime lens for $99. (maybe if the body and lens are plastic? :-))
I started with the 45 1.8 on my E-M5 and just recently added the 17 1.8 when visiting Hong Kong last week (US$485). I had been waiting many months to get my hands on it and decided against the panny 20 1.7. I'm very happy with my two lens set up at the moment but will definitely add one or both of the new Oly 2.8 zooms coming out later in the year.Having done photography for a very long time and as a onetime photo technician, I find the misunderstanding regarding F, focal length, sensor size, light gathering and bokeh quite amusing.. It's not. It has much greater depth of field than a 34mm lens, and substantially different distortion characteristics. Simply put it's a 17mm lens. It's equivalent to a 17mm lens, having been cropped by 50% on 135-format, or by 31% on 6x4.5 120-format, etc. it's equivalent to f/3.6that they have the same size of aperture (9.4mm d), and thus you get anything controled by aperture the same, like the light collecting capability, the exposure (in lumen-second) and shot noise, the depth of field, the diffraction limited resolution (per ph or sqrt(area)), you name it and see all the same, indistinguishable result, with no exception.@yabokkie you clearly don't know what "two stops faster" means, because all f1.8 lenses are the same speed period. You must be thinking of depth of field, which is shallower on the 50mm because it has a longer focal length.
As a four-thirds lens, it produces an equivalent field of view of approximately 34mm. It does not ship with its circular LH-48B lens hood - this optional accessory will run you around $70. The lens takes 46mm filters, and is available now for approximately $500.most people have problem to understand aperture at a certain aov like "36mm at 47 deg" but this equivalent f/1.4 at 50mm. sensor is no lens. micro lenses do not change the projected image. by cropping you cut off light (the image as the result effect of that part of light) thus you get a less quality image. ...but I am going to settle for now with this and am selling my 20mm on ebay this week.....The focus speed of the 17mm lens is enough to make me keep it.Funny...the beginning of the review talks about whether there is room in this focal range for another lens...as far as I am concerned there still is. Give me an AF lens that is ultra sharp, with better contrast and I would be willing to pay more for it, if it is exceptional. This is a classic focal length for so many things..we should have a "Leica-Like" choice. MFT is getting so good...we deserve that option. So...somebody..make that WOW lens in a 17.5mm ...I think it would sell if it is heads above the rest.I agree with Scott. I'll take optical ability over fancy casing any day. Both like the 12 f2 is nice, but one or the other doesn't work at this price point.
It's a 17mm lens, what are you expecting? If you want narrow DoF then you use the lens for the job. Go and troll elsewhere please.you can save money by choosing 4/3" if you would have one lens and five bodies. but if you need five lenses and one body, well, you can still choose 4/3" of course.
17.5mm f/0.9 is a 35mm f/0.9 focal length in m4/3. You may be talking about "depth of field", but you're talking about a different animal. Exposure is the same. You hold a light meter up, get an exposure for like 1/60th at f/2.8 and you put that into your FF cam or m4/3 cam. You do NOT go "oh, i must add two extra stops to the m4/3 to get the right exposure".I LIKE the instant AF/MF via the slide 'n' click focus ring. Reminiscent of the shutter speed dial being on the THROAT of the OM lens mount instead of a dial to twiddle on top.
I also spent some time testing out the EVF (electronic viewfinder), by swiveling the LCD panel in the back, to hide it.I am an FF shooter but I like what I see. The bokeh is superb. Sharpness is adequate. The fist thing that catches the eye is not the sharpness because you still did not have the time to pixel peep. The portrait photos look very good.There should be a function from dpreview which denies equivalence trolls participation in 4/3 article comment areas. Every one is littered with the same ignorance.Marik6 do you work for Fuji? Seriously... The topic is of no importance. Work in a little Fuji her a little Fuji there all with the utmost endearment.marike: I don't think this is true. The 20mm is not "much" sharper. According to reviews and examples I've read, it is sharper in the centre of the frame through all apertures. However, the 17/1.8 is more consistently sharp across the frame into the corners and also has more microcontrast. This means that the 17/1.8 can handle more sharpening in PP. Also, the 17/1.8 focuses much faster and has a manual snap-focus ring.
Is the Olympus 17mm f/1.8 lens good or not? Watch the video to hear Kai's answer :) A more technical review has been also posted by May Olympus come out with a high quality 17mm f/1.4 lens too? That would be nice for all MFT owners asking for an extra super high quality 17mm lens The Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm F1.2 Pro changes that, combining the largest aperture of any wide-angle lens available for the format with exceptional build For comparison, the smaller M.Zuiko 17mm F1.8 uses just nine elements, and even the full-frame Nikon 35mm f/1.4G is made from only 10 elements the current Oly, Pana, and Sony lenses are made for users who have more money than knowledge, the best customers you can find.
I preordered 17mm f1.8 at the very first day it showed up on websites. I am happy with the blazing fast AF speed. So when we talk about lens performance, please be take AF speed into account.It is small, tactile and super fast AF with the OM-D.I use the touchscreen as shutter and it auto-focuses almost instantaneously. The Olympus 17mm 1.2 is worth it's money as it's weather sealed, has that awesome snap-back manual/autofocus switching mode and of course awesome bokeh. But if I was starting out with MFT I would consider other Olympus lenses first (in particular the 75mm 1.8 or 45mm 1.2) 17-Oct-19 Olympus announced the new interchangeable lens camera, the Olympus OM-D E-M5 MarkIII. Kowa : KOWA PROMINAR 8.5mm F2.8 MFT KOWA PROMINAR 12mm F1.8 MFT KOWA PROMINAR 25mm F1.8 MFT. Super wide angle (Model type f=8.5mm) and very little distortion you can have same film, say Fujichrome Velvia 100, on a half-frame, 135, 120, 4x5", and 10x8" formats but every photo will be different. because they got totally different exposures in lumen-second.
It's a good thing there are lenses to choose between in the m4/3 world. This is still a nice lens for some people to bad it did not exceeded the high expectations. In a few months this lens ail be a little bit cheaper and maybe than it has a good price/IQ balance. actually Oly gives MTF charts tested at twice the frequncies used for 35mm-format. the factor 2 works well here, too, to get the equivalent figures.Well, obviously there is enough for you, but for my purposes (contextual portraits) there is really no usable bokeh.
Downloads - Olympus.. > You don't have to look very hard to find a FF or APS-C wide-to-normal with significantly better optics than the 17 1.8 (See Sigma 35 1.4, Fuji 35 1.4, Nikon 35 1.8 DX)The 12-35 was released after the OM-D. Any correction would have to be updated via firmware in the Oly, right?I think more or less, the design of the Pen-F is perfect. Only thing I would get rid of is the video recording button on the top-right of the camera. I figure the user-base for the PEN-F are street photographers or travel photographers, who never shoot video. There is also a video dial you can change (if you ever used it).
Ultra-wide lenses pose special challenges when shooting video, but can create dramatic effects. We review the Laowa 12mm T2.9 Zero-D Cine lens, which shares the same optical formula as the company's 12mm F2.8 lens for full frame cameras.Then I started looking for a mirrorless format with fastest and the most reliable AF in market, no doubt I got the MFT. I first got OM-D with Panny 20mm f1.7. Panny 20mm pancake is razor sharp, as it's what it gains reputation for. But I still failed to achieve my goal of switching from E-mount to MFT. Chromatic aberrations are on the high side for a lens like this, but remain below one pixel-width in size, so shouldn't pose too many issues, except in areas of extreme contrast towards the edges of the frame. Falloff of illumination towards the corners of the frame is reasonably well controlled for a lens with a fast f/1.8 maximum aperture. At f/1.8 the corners are 1.58 stops darker than the image centre and visually uniform illumination is achieved with the aperture closed down to f/4. Unusually, for a wide angle lens, Imatest detected 0.439% pincushion distortion. This level is so low that it should not pose any issues for all but the most demanding applications. If absolutely straight lines are paramount, then you'll be glad to know the the distortion pattern is uniform across the frame. This should make applying corrections in image editing software later a breeze. Olympus has applied their 'ZERO' anti-refection coating to this lens and it is quite resistant to flare as a result. Bright light sources towards the edges, or just beyond the edge of the frame (the sun, for example) can cause a red haze over affected parts of the image. It would've been nice of Olympus to supply a hood with the lens as standard, even it if will rarely be needed. Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm f/1.8 Sample Photos Previous Next However I am a bit concerned that the Micro 4/3rds sensor isn’t going to be “future-proof.” In the consumer market, people are always going to want bigger sensors. It is because we are simpletons and think that “more megapixels = better image quality.” But I personally believe that more megapixels means more problems.. I suggest using of per sqrt(area) for different aspect ratios.
Quoting from your own article: "If you look at the DxO Mark sensor comparison, you will see that if you compare the Olympus OM-D E-M5 with the Nikon D600 and the Canon 5D Mark III (both of which are full frame sensors), they measure roughly 1 2/3 stops better in ISO performance. Not two like you’d expect. You may be thinking ‘that’s close enough, but it speaks to the further point:" Even though this lens may carry a premium price, and a premium place in Olympus' lens line-up, this optic certainly deserves it. £440 for a lens that delivers sharpness like this is excellent value and it should find a home in many a Micro-Four Thirds camera owner's kit bag as a result. Those looking for a moderately wide angle lens wide a fast maximum aperture need look no further.There is an innovative dial in the front, which quickly allows you to change your JPEG settings from color, black and white, and some other ‘art filters’ (which I find a bit gimmicky).
Olympus - M. 17mm f/1.8 Wide-Angle Prime Lens for Select Micro Four-Thirds Interchangeable Lens Cameras - Silver. What others are saying. My review of the Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO lens - in short, it's amazing! What a perfect all-around complement to the Olympus OMD EM-1 The difference in field of view and depth of Field is not a function of the lens. Rather it is the crop sensor of the camera. Take a picture on a FF camera using a 50mm f2.0 lens at iso 400. Now, take that picture and crop it to the same field of view a crop sensor would give. The depth of field now matches perfectly. What you just did manually cropping the image is what a crop sensor does automatically. As a result, the depth of field difference has nothing to do with the lens, it's the crop sensors. That's why a f2.0 is constant no matter what camera you use.
. Super quick AF, tack sharp and all metal construction with a great AF/MF mechanism. I paid $550 here in Australia and am very happy with this lens.After seeing these pictures I'm glad I don't own the best camera of 2012. My old thing does not need a 30 ft long gangway to create some DOF.
the shot of the guy, at iso640,,,looks like a canon G15 iso 400 shot...i thought IQ on e-pm2 and e-pl5 is similar to Nex series...no, not even close,,,at iso1600 on nex you still can get much better sharpness, details...thank god, i choosen nex over m43...i just bought sel 50mm f1.8 and sharpness at 1.8 is phenomenal.... bokeh is another heaven on this lens...Will I personally buy the Pen-F? No. I already am satisfied with the Ricoh GR II I already own, but I would highly recommend the Pen-F for any street/travel photographer— or even any general photographer. The autofocus is super fast, so I’d imagine it is good for photographing your kids, family, and pets.Because it has better sharpness? No test results for this lens yet, but if you compare the Panasonic 20mm it's sharper at wide apertures (especially in the corners) than equivalent cheaper APS and FF lenses until you've stopped those right down, and it's likely (as a premium lens) that this lens will be the same.And while we're at it can we please have sensor sizes in mm rather than measures such as 1 inch, dx etc. These meaningless measures are use all over the place but come on DPReview, take a lead here.
The VFA target should give you a good idea of sharpness in the center and corners, as well as some idea of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the Still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens.The XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS is a telephoto zoom for Fujifilm's X-mount system, covering a full frame equivalent range of 82.5-300mm. We used it to shoot mountains, wildlife and some scenes from the American west.
If the results here are similar to those at lenstip, well, you better never finalize this test. So we know now why the unfinished testsHow do you know? Tested your self?Sharpness is not the whole world.Are you satisfied with contrast of the 20-Panny? Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/2.8 Pancake. Lens DatabasePost Your Review. Lens Description: This wide-angle pancake lens has a convenient focal length (equivalent to 34mm on a 35mm camera) for shooting everything from landscapes and portraits to close ups Field Test: Olympus 17mm f/1.8. Olympus's catalog of small, well-built prime lenses welcomes an interesting new option. The all-metal 17mm f/1.8 lends a classic touch to any M43 body without sacrificing the modern features you've come to rely on. It's a very nice size and weight, and the fit and..
" If enough people follow your lead, it will drop in price or disappear. " ----------------- that explain where 4/3 went and that would be used to explain m43 too.I've also got the old Oly 17mm and there's no comparison between the old and the new, not "somewhat better".The 45 1.8 is such a great lens because it's great optically and doesn't break the bank. Same with the 20 1.7 or even the Sigma 30 2.8.